<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Postage paid (business reply) envelope revenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050723/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050723/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/</link>
	<description>Multimedia Software Developer, Matthew Wilber</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark C.</title>
		<link>http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050723/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-80911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050730/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/#comment-80911</guid>
		<description>According to Post Office Domestic Mail Manual code 8.4.6, &quot;In cases where a BRM card or letter is used improperly as a label, the USPS treats the item as waste.&quot; So unfortunately, the ol&#039; brick in a box trick won&#039;t work. Anytime I receive BRM envelopes, I either put their junk (sans my information) into it or a magazine article. Something that seems like a legit reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Post Office Domestic Mail Manual code 8.4.6, &#8220;In cases where a BRM card or letter is used improperly as a label, the USPS treats the item as waste.&#8221; So unfortunately, the ol&#8217; brick in a box trick won&#8217;t work. Anytime I receive BRM envelopes, I either put their junk (sans my information) into it or a magazine article. Something that seems like a legit reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050723/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 09:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mwilber.com/archives/20050730/postage-paid-business-reply-envelope-revenge/#comment-61</guid>
		<description> I&#039;m very, very impressed that this sort of work is being done; Web Design is getting stagnant with people using just styled 
 block-level elements to produce artwork. The incorporation of SVG into sites excites me a lot.
 How long do you expect it will take for this sort of technology to be widespread? 
 Obviously you can only speak about WebKit realistically, but if it&#039;s going to take ten years for IE Win to gain (full) support, 
 we can&#039;t design with it.
 I&#039;m amused by the &quot;Becoming more important&quot; line in the first paragraph. This has been a HUGE problem for years - 
 ever since HTML-2.0 was introduced to be more of a layout language and less of a markup language. For an example, 
 you just have to look at this site. &lt;a href=&quot;http://sexpartnersfinder.adults-dot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sex partners&lt;/a&gt; Why is all the text 
 crammed over on the left side of the page with a big blank space on the right side? 
 Why is the default font tiny and unreadable? Fortunately most browsers now let you override the latter problem.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very, very impressed that this sort of work is being done; Web Design is getting stagnant with people using just styled<br />
 block-level elements to produce artwork. The incorporation of SVG into sites excites me a lot.<br />
 How long do you expect it will take for this sort of technology to be widespread?<br />
 Obviously you can only speak about WebKit realistically, but if it&#8217;s going to take ten years for IE Win to gain (full) support,<br />
 we can&#8217;t design with it.<br />
 I&#8217;m amused by the &#8220;Becoming more important&#8221; line in the first paragraph. This has been a HUGE problem for years &#8211;<br />
 ever since HTML-2.0 was introduced to be more of a layout language and less of a markup language. For an example,<br />
 you just have to look at this site. <a href="http://sexpartnersfinder.adults-dot.com/" rel="nofollow">sex partners</a> Why is all the text<br />
 crammed over on the left side of the page with a big blank space on the right side?<br />
 Why is the default font tiny and unreadable? Fortunately most browsers now let you override the latter problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

